Skip to content
Van Garcia
Van Garcia speaking at a professional event

Lead Generation Manager & Business Systems Builder

Workflows

Examples of how I approach automating repetitive work, connecting business tools, and improving data processes. Business details are omitted to protect confidentiality.

Anonymized Hands-on Example

Lead Capture & Automated Follow-up

New leads are captured from a form, saved to a spreadsheet, and sent a follow-up email with a link to book a call.

  1. New lead submission

    A lead fills in a form.

    e.g. Facebook Lead Ads

  2. Automation trigger

    The automation platform receives the submission.

    e.g. Zapier, Make, n8n, Activepieces

  3. Map lead fields

    Maps the submitted fields to spreadsheet columns.
  4. Create Google Sheets record

    Saves the lead as a new row for follow-up and tracking.

    e.g. Google Sheets

  5. Send follow-up email

    Sends the lead an automated message.

    e.g. Gmail

  6. Include booking link

    Invites the lead to book a call. Booking is their choice.

    e.g. Calendly link

Example fields (fictional):full_nameemailphonesubmitted_at
An anonymized example of a workflow I built to capture leads, organize submission data, and automate email follow-ups. Business and client information is intentionally omitted.
Read this workflow as text
  1. A new lead submits a form, for example a Facebook Lead Ads form.
  2. The automation platform (for example Zapier, Make, n8n, or Activepieces) receives the submission.
  3. The workflow maps the submitted fields to the spreadsheet columns: full name, email, phone number, and submission time.
  4. It adds the lead as a new row in Google Sheets for follow-up and tracking.
  5. It sends the lead a follow-up email through Gmail.
  6. The email includes a booking link, such as a Calendly link. The lead chooses whether to book a call; the workflow doesn't book it.
  7. The workflow doesn't decide whether a lead is genuine or will become a customer, and email delivery depends on the recipient's mail provider.
Example Architecture

Automated File Processing, Validation & Approval

A representative design for receiving data files, cleaning and checking them, and updating a central system only after a person approves the changes.

Stage 1 · File ingestion & pre-validation

File submission

An email attachment or a file in a shared folder.

e.g. Gmail, Outlook, Google Drive, Dropbox

Automated file watcher

Retrieves the file and creates a processing log entry.

e.g. Make, Zapier, n8n

Format, size & headers valid?

Invalid

Correction required

Processing stops. The file is flagged and the sender is asked to fix and resubmit.
Valid

Marked Pending Audit

Only valid files continue.

Stage 2 · Cleaning & validation engine

Data cleaning & standardization

Parses the data and standardizes names, phone numbers, addresses, and dates.

Duplicate & numerical validation

Compares records with existing data, finds duplicates and missing required fields, and checks row counts and totals for mismatches.

Audit & change report

New, updated, duplicate, and invalid records, numerical discrepancies, and validation results.

Stage 3 · Human review (required)

Reviewer alerted

The audit results are sent for review.

e.g. Email, Slack, Microsoft Teams

Human review

Original and cleaned summaries, proposed inserts and updates, flagged records, validation failures, and reconciliation results.

Approved?

Reject / edit

Stopped before any database update

Corrections or a re-upload are requested. The revised file returns to Stage 1 validation.
Approve

Approval recorded

Approval status and timestamp are saved.
Approved batches only

Stage 4 · Monitoring sync & report

Sync approved data

Appends new records and updates existing ones, without duplicate inserts.

Sync succeeded?

Failed

Sync failed

The batch is marked failed and an alert is sent. No completion status is recorded.
Succeeded

Update monitoring system

Recalculates metrics and refreshes summary data.

Generate report

e.g. PDF, Excel, CSV

Processing complete

A representative architecture for automating file intake, data validation, approval, and reporting. It illustrates a possible system design, not a verified production deployment.
Read this workflow as text
  1. Stage 1. A file arrives as an email attachment or in a shared folder (for example Gmail, Outlook, Google Drive, or Dropbox).
  2. An automated file watcher (for example Make, Zapier, or n8n) retrieves the file and creates a processing log entry.
  3. The workflow checks the file's format, size, and expected column headers. If any check fails, processing stops and the file is flagged for correction. It never reaches the cleaning step.
  4. If the checks pass, the file is marked Pending Audit.
  5. Stage 2. The data is parsed and standardized: names, phone numbers, addresses, and dates.
  6. Records are compared with existing data to find duplicates and missing required fields. Row counts and numerical totals are checked for mismatches.
  7. An audit and change report lists new records, updated records, duplicates, invalid or incomplete records, numerical discrepancies, and validation results.
  8. Stage 3. A reviewer is alerted (for example by email, Slack, or Microsoft Teams) and reviews the proposed changes, flagged records, and reconciliation results.
  9. If the reviewer rejects the batch or requests edits, the workflow stops before the master database is updated. Corrections are requested, and the revised file starts again at Stage 1 validation.
  10. If the reviewer approves, the approval status and timestamp are recorded.
  11. Stage 4. Only approved changes are synced: new records are appended and existing records updated, without duplicate inserts.
  12. If the sync fails, the batch is marked failed and an alert is sent. No completion status is recorded.
  13. If the sync succeeds, monitoring metrics and summary data are refreshed, a report is generated (for example PDF, Excel, or CSV), and the batch is marked Processing Complete.

Possible Implementation Stack · Option A

No-code / low-code

  • Make or Zapier for workflow orchestration
  • Google Sheets and Apps Script for spreadsheet operations
  • Python cloud functions when complex processing is needed
  • Google Sheets or Airtable for monitoring
  • Slack or Airtable Interfaces for approval
  • Email notifications

Possible Implementation Stack · Option B

Open-source / custom

  • n8n for orchestration
  • Python and pandas for data processing
  • PostgreSQL or the Google Sheets API for storage and sync
  • A custom approval app or a team messaging integration
  • Structured reporting

These are illustrative implementation options, not a record of the technologies deployed in a particular project.

Potential benefits

  • Reduced repetitive data entry
  • Consistent validation rules
  • Easier discrepancy identification
  • Human oversight before synchronization
  • Improved processing visibility
  • Standardized reporting

Potential benefits of this design, not measured outcomes.

About these examples

Anonymized Hands-on Example
A type of workflow I have built. Details are generic, and the field names are fictional.
Example Architecture
A representative system design, not a verified production deployment. The implementation stacks are illustrative options.
Confidentiality
No business, client, or customer information is shown. The diagrams are drawn for this page, not taken from real systems.

Contact

garciavanjm@gmail.com